The Energy Collective

The world's best thinkers on energy and climate

  • Home
  • Post Here
  • Columns
    • Electricity Markets & Policy Group
    • Full Spectrum
    • Energy and Policy Developments
    • Game Changers
    • Energy for Human Development
    • Seeking Consensus
    • Green Growth
    • New Energy Voices
  • Fuels
    • Oil
    • Wind
    • Nuclear Power
    • Coal
    • Natural Gas
    • Solar Power
    • Renewables
    • Biofuels
    • Geothermal Energy
    • Wave & Tidal
    • Hydro Power
  • Environment
    • Carbon and De-carbonization
    • International Climate Conferences
    • Sustainability
    • Climate
    • Public Health
    • Water
    • Recycling
  • Grid
    • Smart Grid
    • Electricity
  • Tech
    • Cleantech
    • Green Building
    • Storage
    • Rare Earth Minerals
  • Business and Economy
    • Cap-and-Trade
    • Agriculture
    • Efficiency
    • Green Business
    • Utilities
    • Finance
    • Green Jobs
    • Subsidies
    • Risk Management
  • Politics
    • Environmental Policy
    • Energy Security
    • Communications and Messaging
    • China
  • Transport
  • Help
    • FAQ
  • Account
    • Login
    • Register

Obstructing Maine’s Business and Energy Future: Why Governor LePage is Standing in the Way of Wind Energy

February 5, 2014 by Clean Energy Leadership Institute

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Maine and Wind Energy Policy

Posted by Andy Estrada

Maine is a potential hotbed for new wind energy production. Over the past decade, hundreds of wind turbines have been constructed, many in rural areas. These wind energy projects have created hundreds of jobs and now power around 160,000 homes throughout the state. Clean energy initiatives have greatly benefited Maine’s environment and economy, which is why state legislators have set goals to produce 2,000 MW of installed wind energy capacity by 2015 and 3,000 MW by 2020. However, the increase in wind projects in the state is no thanks to Governor Paul LePage and his Administration. LePage, who has experience in private sector management, has proclaimed himself the “leader in Maine business,” but his private sector leadership has not been reflected in his policies on and actions toward Maine’s wind energy industry.

In the course of the last 14 months alone, LePage’s Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has denied at least three major projects simply due to aesthetic reasons. For example, in August, DEP Commissioner Patricia Aho denied the application of First Wind, a company that proposed the construction of 16 turbines because the project would have an “unreasonable adverse effect on the scenic character and existing uses related to scenic character.” To be fair, the area of proposed development, Bowers Hill, is beautiful. But the project would have produced 48 MW of energy, which is enough to power an average 20,000 homes. Furthermore, this development would produce jobs and give a boost to the economy of rural eastern Penobscot County. It is perplexing that Maine’s “pro-business” governor would chase away such a pro-business proposal.

However, LePage isn’t all business; he supposedly has a great love of Maine’s environment, which could justify the rejection of some land-based wind power proposals. But surely he would lend his support to offshore wind proposals, right? Apparently not. In mid-October, the LePage Administration succeeded in crushing the proposed offshore wind project of the Norwegian company Statoil. Maine’s Public Utilities Commission finalized a term sheet with Statoil earlier this year, but LePage led the charge in destroying the $120 million wind project, saying he preferred a project developed by the University of Maine system instead.

The notion of forgoing a big business proposal to accommodate the public college’s efforts sounds great; after all, everyone wants to stand up for the little guy. But by rejecting a fire-ready proposal, LePage has closed the door to dozens of new jobs and a major source of new money for the state’s economy.

Now, if the University of Maine could create similar opportunities, that wouldn’t be so bad, but the Governor’s administration has underfunded Maine’s public education system for years now, with no sign of changing its practices in light of this recent offshore wind proposal decision. For example, the University of Maine’s FY2014 Operating Budget Plan indicates that “the State appropriation for FY14 is $6.2 million below the FY08 level.” Furthermore, Lepage’s Office of Policy Management (OPM) recently set a “savings target” for the University of Maine System, which requires the public education institution to cut another two million dollars in spending. OPM’s October report encourages the UMaine System to cut costs by reducing maintenance expenses, consolidating IT functions, reviewing their employee health insurance programs, and eliminating programs. Thus, LePage rejected a big-business proposal in favor of a project that will likely struggle to find the funding necessary to launch in any significant way in the near future. This is especially disappointing when one considers that the Statoil project could have been approved while the LePage Administration simultaneously lent state support to a University of Maine offshore wind proposal that would then be launched in the future.

Governor LePage has served as a continued hindrance to the development of Maine’s sustainable, economy-boosting wind energy industry. It is time for LePage to start acting like the “business-friendly” governor he purports to be, before Maine falls even further behind its New England neighbors in aggregate wind energy production.

Related posts:

The Road to Marrakesh: Bonn Climate Talks Begin, After Paris a “New Era of Collaboration” U.S. Energy Independence Day Dawns Interview/Preview: Energy Transition Architect Claude Turmes Tells Inside Story of EU Energy Policy What Do We Want From California Climate Policy?

Clean Energy Leadership Institute

Filed Under: Carbon and De-carbonization, Cleantech, Communications and Messaging, Efficiency, Electricity, Energy, Energy and Economy, Energy Security, Environment, Environmental Policy, Fuels, Green Business, Green Jobs, News, Politics & Legislation, Sustainability, Tech, Utilities, Wind Tagged With: maine, wind energy development, wind industry

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of

The Energy Collective Columns

Full Spectrum: Energy Analysis and Commentary with Jesse JenkinsEnergy and Policy Developments with John Miller
Game Changers column badgeEnergy for Human Development Column
Seeking Consensus with Schalk CloeteGreen Growth with Silvio Marcacci
New Energy VoicesMore coming soon...

Latest comments

  • EngineerPoet on Closing Nuclear Reactors in Ohio and Pennsylvania Will Thwart Climate Goals No demand shifts would have to be forced.  We are in a new regime where power prices can go to (April 19, 2018 at 6:34 PM)
  • BobMeinetz on Closing Nuclear Reactors in Ohio and Pennsylvania Will Thwart Climate Goals The issue is that wind & solar use thousands of small generators to supply 1GW. Hence sudden fai (April 19, 2018 at 5:58 PM)
  • BobMeinetz on Closing Nuclear Reactors in Ohio and Pennsylvania Will Thwart Climate Goals Sean, despite myths advanced by anti-nuclear activists, nuclear plants have been able to follow dema (April 19, 2018 at 5:46 PM)
  • BobMeinetz on This Cleantech Hotspot is Giving New York and California a Run for Their Money DIck, once again your comical sidestepping around the real reason Chicago is a clean energy leader - (April 19, 2018 at 5:24 PM)

Advisory Panel

About the panel

Scott Edward Anderson is a consultant, blogger, and media commentator who blogs at The Green Skeptic. More »


Christine Hertzog is a consultant, author, and a professional explainer focused on Smart Grid. More »


Elias Hinckley is a strategic advisor on energy finance and energy policy to investors, energy companies and governments More »


Gary Hunt Gary is an Executive-in-Residence at Deloitte Investments with extensive experience in the energy & utility industries. More »


Jesse Jenkins is a graduate student and researcher at MIT with expertise in energy technology, policy, and innovation. More »


Jim Pierobon helps trade associations/NGOs, government agencies and companies communicate about cleaner energy solutions. More »


Geoffrey Styles is Managing Director of GSW Strategy Group, LLC and an award-winning blogger. More »


Featured Contributors

Rod Adams

Scott Edward Anderson

Charles Barton

Barry Brook

Steven Cohen

Dick DeBlasio

Senator Pete Domenici

Simon Donner

Big Gav

Michael Giberson

Kirsty Gogan

James Greenberger

Lou Grinzo

Jesse Grossman

Tyler Hamilton

Christine Hertzog

David Hone

Gary Hunt

Jesse Jenkins

Sonita Lontoh

Rebecca Lutzy

Jesse Parent

Jim Pierobon

Vicky Portwain

Willem Post

Tom Raftery

Joseph Romm

Robert Stavins

Robert Stowe

Geoffrey Styles

Alex Trembath

Gernot Wagner

Dan Yurman

 

 

 

Follow Us

32-linkedin 32-facebook 32-twitter 32-rss

Content for personal use only. Distribution prohibited. Republication in part or in whole is strictly prohibited. © All rights reserved Energy Central © 2018

Recent Comments

  • EngineerPoet on Closing Nuclear Reactors in Ohio and Pennsylvania Will Thwart Climate Goals
  • BobMeinetz on Closing Nuclear Reactors in Ohio and Pennsylvania Will Thwart Climate Goals
  • BobMeinetz on Closing Nuclear Reactors in Ohio and Pennsylvania Will Thwart Climate Goals

Recent Posts

  • A Toolkit of Global Insights as China Builds Its Power Sector of the Future
  • $100 Oil Is Back On The Table
  • New Solar Capacity Exceeded All Other Fuel Sources Combined in 2017, Study Finds

Useful Pages

  • Terms of Use
  • Comments Policy
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • Help
  • About and Contact Us
Copyright © 2018 Energy Central. All Rights Reserved
This site uses cookies, for a number of reasons. By continuing to use this website you accept the use of cookies. Find out more.