Where was there an anti-nuclear word in this article?
Also -- you are confusing me with the subject of the article when you say, "You want to replace..."
Yours is the usual victim-mentality of cognitively-biased nuclear fanatics intent on keeping leaking 40-year old nuke plants on line. There might be an increase in NG usage and GHGs as we close these old, creaky nuclear plants. That might be the way the transition to a more renewable-intensive energy mix looks. Better than sitting around waiting for something really bad to happen with these geriatric nuclear plants.
Many more nuclear plants are going to be shut down in the coming years -- with immense costs to ratepayers. What's the cost to close SONGS? $4 billion?
I've noticed the nuclear fanatics practically morph into Bill McKibben when you want to close down one of their precious plants. There might be a place for nuclear power but not for nuclear power fanatics.
Thanks for continuing to read Greentech Media Bob. We value your readership and viewpoint.