The Energy Collective

The world's best thinkers on energy and climate

  • Home
  • Post Here
  • Columns
    • Electricity Markets & Policy Group
    • Full Spectrum
    • Energy and Policy Developments
    • Game Changers
    • Energy for Human Development
    • Seeking Consensus
    • Green Growth
    • New Energy Voices
  • Fuels
    • Oil
    • Wind
    • Nuclear Power
    • Coal
    • Natural Gas
    • Solar Power
    • Renewables
    • Biofuels
    • Geothermal Energy
    • Wave & Tidal
    • Hydro Power
  • Environment
    • Carbon and De-carbonization
    • International Climate Conferences
    • Sustainability
    • Climate
    • Public Health
    • Water
    • Recycling
  • Grid
    • Smart Grid
    • Electricity
  • Tech
    • Cleantech
    • Green Building
    • Storage
    • Rare Earth Minerals
  • Business and Economy
    • Cap-and-Trade
    • Agriculture
    • Efficiency
    • Green Business
    • Utilities
    • Finance
    • Green Jobs
    • Subsidies
    • Risk Management
  • Politics
    • Environmental Policy
    • Energy Security
    • Communications and Messaging
    • China
  • Transport
  • Help
    • FAQ
  • Account
    • Login
    • Register

The Existential Imperative: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion

February 11, 2013 by Jim Baird

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

tidal thermal conversionA 2006 study led by Michael Behrenfeld, at Oregon State University suggested warming oceans produce less phytoplankton. It outlined as well the importance of this finding by pointing out this basic form of plant life are the base of the ocean food chain and absorb substantial amounts of carbon from the atmosphere. They do this by converting the carbon to organic matter by photosynthesis giving off oxygen in the process.

It has been suggested our atmosphere contained no oxygen before cyanobacteria, which are a form of phytoplankton, came into existence about 2.45 billion years ago and that all forms of phytoplankton continue to produce about half of our planet’s oxygen.

The Behrenfield study found that between 1999 to 2004, some regions of the oceans experienced a phytoplankton decline of as much as 30% and that globally about 190 million tonnes of carbon per year were not absorbed due to this decline.

The 2006 models predicted that the loss of plankton due to warming in the mid-latitudes would be reversed near the poles, where researchers expect to see a rise in productivity. They did not however expect that this rise would counter the loss of plankton from the tropical region.

A 2010 paper, “Global phytoplankton decline over the past century” by Daniel G. Boyce et al. reinforced the 2006 finding and postulated the reason for the phytoplankton decline, which was estimated at close to one percent per year since 1950, was thermal stratification of the oceans. “The plants need sunlight from above and nutrients from below; and as it becomes more stratified, that limits the availability of nutrients,” said Boyce.

Thermal stratification is the same phenomena that makes the generation of power in a heat engine possible with ocean thermal energy conversion. And the movement of surface heat to a depth of 1000 meters to produce power would lessen the thermal stratification and produce convection that would  bring the nutrients phytoplankton require back to the euphotic zone.

A more recent paper, A Global Pattern of Thermal Adaptation in Marine Phytoplankton by Mridul Thomas et al. estimated that by 2090 as much as one third of tropical species of phytoplankton will be forced by ocean warming to migrate towards the poles, adapt, or die.

Unfortunately a recent article in The Economist suggests that global warming may make the northernmost ocean less productive, not more so and again the main reason is stratification of the ocean. In this case however it is caused by less dense melt water from the icecap sitting on the surface.

The article concludes by stating, “A warming Arctic will not, in other words, be full of fish. It will simply be an ice-free version of the desert it already is.”

There is no reason to conclude why the Antarctic would be any different.

According to NASA, the poles are warming faster than the rest of the planet (creating density stratification) largely as a result of energy in the atmosphere being transported through large weather systems.

A paper “Artificial Upwelling for Environmental Enhancement” by a group from the University of Hawaii and Florida Atlantic University pointed out, ”The prospect of global climate warming will only mean more intense and frequent hurricanes, as they do not form in the North Atlantic when the monthly mean temperature is less than 26.8C.” (The oceans have accumulated over 90 percent of the heat attributable to climate change and Hurricane Sandy was powered by sea surface temperatures 3C above normal.)

“Hurricanes form in warmer waters and dissipate when incurring a temperature drop of 2C. Thus, if a mechanism can be found to lower the temperature of the ocean surface in those areas of the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans where hurricanes/typhoons are normally generated, it is possible that the frequency or severity of them can be minimized, if not entirely eliminated.”

As was suggested in the Hawaii/Florida paper and by Ray Schmitt, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, “Assessing the potential of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion(OTEC)”, OTEC is the mechanism by which hurricanes can be minimized, if not eliminated.

Schmitt and Gerard Nihous of the University of Hawaii also have estimated OTEC has the potential to produce as much as 24-25 terawatts of power, whereas the world currently operates on about 16 terawatts.

The research cited above as well as the damage caused by recent storm activity suggests there are vital reasons for us to be doing this.

 

Related posts:

Energy and the Environment State Department Outlines ‘New Architecture’ to Address Climate Change G7 Agreement Adds Momentum to Strong Global Climate Agreement this Year Four Demands for Paris

Jim Baird

Jim Baird is an energy and climate expert, inventor, writer, and the owner of Positive Energy Systems

Filed Under: Climate, Energy, Renewables, Sustainability

The Energy Collective Columns

Full Spectrum: Energy Analysis and Commentary with Jesse JenkinsEnergy and Policy Developments with John Miller
Game Changers column badgeEnergy for Human Development Column
Seeking Consensus with Schalk CloeteGreen Growth with Silvio Marcacci
New Energy VoicesMore coming soon...

Latest comments

  • BobMeinetz on Closing Nuclear Reactors in Ohio and Pennsylvania Will Thwart Climate Goals Bas, nuclear plants in Germany didn’t go below 60% of their max because they didn’t need to. Today (April 20, 2018 at 4:28 PM)
  • BobMeinetz on New Solar Capacity Exceeded All Other Fuel Sources Combined in 2017, Study Finds Bas, I’m sorry my comments sounds negative to you. I can only respond with a favorite quote attribut (April 20, 2018 at 4:15 PM)
  • BobMeinetz on Closing Nuclear Reactors in Ohio and Pennsylvania Will Thwart Climate Goals Roger, yours a more complete and patient response than mine. In the past I’ve been discouraged fr (April 20, 2018 at 3:59 PM)
  • Bas Gresnigt on Closing Nuclear Reactors in Ohio and Pennsylvania Will Thwart Climate Goals Yes, wind and solar output is not baseload at all. There low marginal costs imply that base load ge (April 20, 2018 at 3:32 PM)

Advisory Panel

About the panel

Scott Edward Anderson is a consultant, blogger, and media commentator who blogs at The Green Skeptic. More »


Christine Hertzog is a consultant, author, and a professional explainer focused on Smart Grid. More »


Elias Hinckley is a strategic advisor on energy finance and energy policy to investors, energy companies and governments More »


Gary Hunt Gary is an Executive-in-Residence at Deloitte Investments with extensive experience in the energy & utility industries. More »


Jesse Jenkins is a graduate student and researcher at MIT with expertise in energy technology, policy, and innovation. More »


Jim Pierobon helps trade associations/NGOs, government agencies and companies communicate about cleaner energy solutions. More »


Geoffrey Styles is Managing Director of GSW Strategy Group, LLC and an award-winning blogger. More »


Featured Contributors

Rod Adams

Scott Edward Anderson

Charles Barton

Barry Brook

Steven Cohen

Dick DeBlasio

Senator Pete Domenici

Simon Donner

Big Gav

Michael Giberson

Kirsty Gogan

James Greenberger

Lou Grinzo

Jesse Grossman

Tyler Hamilton

Christine Hertzog

David Hone

Gary Hunt

Jesse Jenkins

Sonita Lontoh

Rebecca Lutzy

Jesse Parent

Jim Pierobon

Vicky Portwain

Willem Post

Tom Raftery

Joseph Romm

Robert Stavins

Robert Stowe

Geoffrey Styles

Alex Trembath

Gernot Wagner

Dan Yurman

 

 

 

Follow Us

32-linkedin 32-facebook 32-twitter 32-rss

Content for personal use only. Distribution prohibited. Republication in part or in whole is strictly prohibited. © All rights reserved Energy Central © 2018

Recent Comments

  • BobMeinetz on Closing Nuclear Reactors in Ohio and Pennsylvania Will Thwart Climate Goals
  • BobMeinetz on New Solar Capacity Exceeded All Other Fuel Sources Combined in 2017, Study Finds
  • BobMeinetz on Closing Nuclear Reactors in Ohio and Pennsylvania Will Thwart Climate Goals

Recent Posts

  • UK Will Legislate Net-Zero Carbon Emissions Target, Says Minister
  • Why EPA’s U-Turn on Auto Efficiency Rules Gives China the Upper Hand
  • U.S. Natural Gas Production and Consumption Increase in Nearly All AEO2018 Cases

Useful Pages

  • Terms of Use
  • Comments Policy
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • Help
  • About and Contact Us
Copyright © 2018 Energy Central. All Rights Reserved
This site uses cookies, for a number of reasons. By continuing to use this website you accept the use of cookies. Find out more.