The Energy Collective

The world's best thinkers on energy and climate

  • Home
  • Post Here
  • Columns
    • Electricity Markets & Policy Group
    • Full Spectrum
    • Energy and Policy Developments
    • Game Changers
    • Energy for Human Development
    • Seeking Consensus
    • Green Growth
    • New Energy Voices
  • Fuels
    • Oil
    • Wind
    • Nuclear Power
    • Coal
    • Natural Gas
    • Solar Power
    • Renewables
    • Biofuels
    • Geothermal Energy
    • Wave & Tidal
    • Hydro Power
  • Environment
    • Carbon and De-carbonization
    • International Climate Conferences
    • Sustainability
    • Climate
    • Public Health
    • Water
    • Recycling
  • Grid
    • Smart Grid
    • Electricity
  • Tech
    • Cleantech
    • Green Building
    • Storage
    • Rare Earth Minerals
  • Business and Economy
    • Cap-and-Trade
    • Agriculture
    • Efficiency
    • Green Business
    • Utilities
    • Finance
    • Green Jobs
    • Subsidies
    • Risk Management
  • Politics
    • Environmental Policy
    • Energy Security
    • Communications and Messaging
    • China
  • Transport
  • Help
    • FAQ
  • Account
    • Login
    • Register

Executive Survey: Businesses Expect Some Form Of Carbon Tax

June 7, 2012 by JimPierobon

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Image

More companies are setting formal energy cost-cutting goals and in the process making energy management a strategic discipline. That is one dimension of Deloitte’s second annual survey designed to help executives make energy-related investment and business decisions.

Conducted for Deloitte’s Center for Energy Solutions by the Harrison Group market research firm, the survey also found a growing number of companies anticipating more stringent environmental regulatory requirements; this despite the impact that Tea Party and ultra-conservative lawmakers are having in Congress and some state legislatures and the results from the victory of Republican Governor Scott Walker in Wisconsin in yesterday’s recall election.

“Businesses eventually believe that something is going to come around in terms of carbon. They think it is inevitable that it will happen,” said Marlene Motyka, the leader of Deloitte’s alternative energy practice (photo).

While 35% of companies say they generate some portion of their electricity from on-site renewables, co-generation or other methods — and another 17% are planning on doing so — renewable energy faces steeper uphill climbs as it struggles in many business sectors to compete with low natural gas prices (about $2.40 / MMBtus at this writing).

Marlene Motyka brings a chemical engineering background to Deloitte’s alternative energy consulting work. She is also a Principal in the firm’s valuation services practice. CREDIT: Deloitte

Regulating carbon emissions, be it with a carbon tax or cap and trade program, is a something many businesses expect to deal with, according to Motyka. To wit:

  • 79% of business respondents believe that the cost of carbon should be factored into use of traditional electricity sources, up from 72% in 2011.
  • 72% said their companies are, or will be, recognizing the cost of carbon as an important long-term balance sheet item. That’s compared to 58% the previous year. But here’s the rub….
  • 80% said the cost of carbon is very difficult to measure with any confidence, up from 71% in 2011.

Deloitte conducted one-on-one interviews with executives across many industries along with more than 600 interviews with “business decision makers.”

The consumer portion of the survey, based on about 2,200 “demographically balanced” online interviews, may be a bit less reliable due to the potential drawbacks inherent of online surveys. Yet they produced an intriguing response (at least as it was interpreted by this writer):

About two-thirds of consumers indicated a willingness to pay a surcharge on their electricity bills to support investments in alternative energy intended to reduce pollution and add local American jobs. Deloitte said 66% of them were willing to pay a mandatory 2% surcharge; 49% indicated a willingness to pay a mandatory 4% surcharge; that’s right, a mandatory surcharge.

There’s more to this:

Unlike the 2011 survey, support among consumers for a surcharge declines to 59% and 44% respectively when the surcharge is voluntary, not mandatory. This suggests that as long as we ALL have to pay a surcharge, thus generating a significant source of capital for governments, it’s better than relying on a few willing to do so voluntarily.

Could this be a green / silver lining to helping finance renewables where such a mechanism does not already exist?

Back to the corporate side of the equation, despite capital funding challenges, businesses are steadfast in investing in energy efficiency:

  • 61% have pay-off period requirements with an average of about four years
  • 57% have an internal rate of return (IRR) requirement
  • Of those that do have an IRR mandate, the average IRR hurdle is 21%.

Motyka said low natural gas prices and falling power prices are putting pressure on renewable technologies and coal technologies. That, combined with more restrictive environmental regulations, could speed up the already quickening pace of coal plant retirements.

After speaking with many of the survey participants, Motyka said “the thought is gas prices will go up.” When, she would not venture a guess. Perhaps THAT is the biggest question facing utilities and corporate energy managers, not to mention developers of renewable sources of electricity.

“We did see from our study some loss of (consumer) enthusiasm for support of wind and solar in favor of natural gas development,” Motyka said. “But they are still very interested in looking at residential solar for their houses.”

What surprised Motyka about this year’s survey compared to last year’s? Consumers are becoming better at managing their energy costs as another way to save money. “The recession made us more efficient.”

Back on the business side, Motyka said clients continue to ask for help assessing which, if any, alternative energy strategies make sense to remain competitive either from a financial perspective, an image perspective , or both.

“Businesses are getting increasing pressure from their customers or their clients to offer more environmentally friendly alternatives,” she said. “That is pushing businesses to generate more electricity from alternative sources or to purchase electricity from alternative sources. And they want to advertise it to their customers.”

Now that many consumers and businesses have cut their energy costs by tackling the “low-hanging fruit,” the bar is higher to go beyond that. And that means significant capital costs and the time to decide how to spend that money wisely.  Businesses in particular face staffing challenges to get the job done.

For both, the save more money going forward is expected to be a lot more difficult.

Image Credit: Alex Mit/Shutterstock

Related posts:

Innovation Before Carbon Pricing Shell Oil Self-Imposes Carbon Pollution Tax High Enough To Crash Coal, Erase Natural Gas’s Value-Add Is a Carbon Tax a Sensible Alternative to Subsidies? A Carbon Tax on Me: How to Cut Emissions, Save Money, Invest for the Future and Help End Energy Poverty

JimPierobon

As a career-long advocate for cleaner, safer and more secure energy solutions, Jim creates and executes digital publishing and marketing campaigns for media organizations, non-profits, trade association/NGOs and government agencies through Pierobon & Partners LLC. He provides updates on these "Game Changers" columns at TheEnergyFix.com. Among other positions, he has co-managed the energy and environmental practice at Ogilvy Public Relations Worldwide, served as VP-Market Development and Chief Marketing Officer of Standard Solar, Inc. and was the Chief Energy Writer at the Houston Chronicle.

Filed Under: Cap-and-Trade, Carbon and De-carbonization, Climate, Efficiency, Energy and Economy, Green Business Tagged With: carbon tax

The Energy Collective Columns

Full Spectrum: Energy Analysis and Commentary with Jesse JenkinsEnergy and Policy Developments with John Miller
Game Changers column badgeEnergy for Human Development Column
Seeking Consensus with Schalk CloeteGreen Growth with Silvio Marcacci
New Energy VoicesMore coming soon...

Latest comments

  • Jarmo on New Solar Capacity Exceeded All Other Fuel Sources Combined in 2017, Study Finds https://www.thirdway.org/memo/nuclear-closures-undo-years-worth-of-climate-progress This article pu (April 22, 2018 at 5:57 AM)
  • Geoff Thomas on New Study Explores the Market Value of Offshore Wind It is wise that the Authors noted their dependance on earlier figures because of three major items, (April 22, 2018 at 4:51 AM)
  • Roger Arnold on $100 Oil Is Back On The Table "The cost of had"? I recommend proof reading what you've written before hitting 'post'. Relying on s (April 21, 2018 at 8:15 PM)
  • BobMeinetz on Climate Change Optimism: Five Years of Change Correction, Bob - quantities of both insolation and human consumption should be per year, not per da (April 21, 2018 at 4:09 PM)

Advisory Panel

About the panel

Scott Edward Anderson is a consultant, blogger, and media commentator who blogs at The Green Skeptic. More »


Christine Hertzog is a consultant, author, and a professional explainer focused on Smart Grid. More »


Elias Hinckley is a strategic advisor on energy finance and energy policy to investors, energy companies and governments More »


Gary Hunt Gary is an Executive-in-Residence at Deloitte Investments with extensive experience in the energy & utility industries. More »


Jesse Jenkins is a graduate student and researcher at MIT with expertise in energy technology, policy, and innovation. More »


Jim Pierobon helps trade associations/NGOs, government agencies and companies communicate about cleaner energy solutions. More »


Geoffrey Styles is Managing Director of GSW Strategy Group, LLC and an award-winning blogger. More »


Featured Contributors

Rod Adams

Scott Edward Anderson

Charles Barton

Barry Brook

Steven Cohen

Dick DeBlasio

Senator Pete Domenici

Simon Donner

Big Gav

Michael Giberson

Kirsty Gogan

James Greenberger

Lou Grinzo

Jesse Grossman

Tyler Hamilton

Christine Hertzog

David Hone

Gary Hunt

Jesse Jenkins

Sonita Lontoh

Rebecca Lutzy

Jesse Parent

Jim Pierobon

Vicky Portwain

Willem Post

Tom Raftery

Joseph Romm

Robert Stavins

Robert Stowe

Geoffrey Styles

Alex Trembath

Gernot Wagner

Dan Yurman

 

 

 

Follow Us

32-linkedin 32-facebook 32-twitter 32-rss

Content for personal use only. Distribution prohibited. Republication in part or in whole is strictly prohibited. © All rights reserved Energy Central © 2018

Recent Comments

  • Jarmo on New Solar Capacity Exceeded All Other Fuel Sources Combined in 2017, Study Finds
  • Geoff Thomas on New Study Explores the Market Value of Offshore Wind
  • Roger Arnold on $100 Oil Is Back On The Table

Recent Posts

  • The U.S. is an Active Participant in Petroleum Markets as Both an Importer and Exporter
  • What ALA’s Most Recent State of the Air Report Reveals About Oil and Gas Air Pollution in the Western U.S.
  • UK Will Legislate Net-Zero Carbon Emissions Target, Says Minister

Useful Pages

  • Terms of Use
  • Comments Policy
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • Help
  • About and Contact Us
Copyright © 2018 Energy Central. All Rights Reserved
This site uses cookies, for a number of reasons. By continuing to use this website you accept the use of cookies. Find out more.