More than 150 advocates from around the country descended upon Capitol Hill Wednesday in support of responsible funding for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP). The National Energy and Utility Affordability Coalition (NEUAC) sponsored LIHEAP Action Day 2014 along with member companies of the American Gas Association (AGA) and the Edison Electric Institute. The day-long event is aimed at building awareness for LIHEAP. The federal block grant program provides financial assistance to low and fixed-income individuals for fuel and utility bills, as well as low-cost weatherization and energy-related home repairs.
Representatives from Entergy meet with Rep. Bill Flores (TX-17) to discuss LIHEAP funding. Photo Credit: Entergy
Dozens of LIHEAP advocates met with members of Congress and their staff, and took to social media advocating for $4.7 billion in LIHEAP funding for FY2015. You can share your thoughts about the importance of LIHEAP by using the hashtag #LIHEAPAction.
After many years of underfunding LIHEAP, Congress funded the program at $5.1 billion in FY2009 and FY2010. Since then, funding has been cut drastically from $4.7 billion in FY2011 to less than $3.4 billion for the current fiscal year. President Barack Obama’s 2015 budget request is for $2.8 billion. These funding cuts have resulted in smaller assistance grants and fewer households served, severely limiting the program’s effectiveness.
This winter’s record breaking cold temperatures have been a stark reminder of why the LIHEAP program is so critical. Here are just a few other reasons:
- According to the 2010 U.S. Census Bureau, more than 46 million people live in poverty – the largest number in the 52-year history of published poverty estimates.
- Even with LIHEAP funding at $5.1 billion, the amount was only enough to assist 1 in 5 eligible Americans.
- The average low- and fixed-income family spends 13.5 percent of its annual household income on energy – almost twice the 7.2 percent spent by the average U.S. household.
- LIHEAP supports veterans and seniors. The number of veteran households served by LIHEAP increased by more than 150 percent over three years. Roughly 40 percent of LIHEAP recipients are seniors.
- Roughly 75 percent of households receiving assistance earn less than $15,000 a year and 50 percent earn less than $10,000 a year.
- Almost all recipient households support someone who is disabled, elderly, or have a child under six.
- Home energy insecurity can lead to diminished child health, home fires and deaths, choices of “heat or eat” and homelessness.
NEUAC’s John Rich presents U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski with the Extra Mile award. Photo Credit: NEUAC
LIHEAP Action Day concluded with a Congressional reception and the presentation of the NEUAC Extra Mile award given to U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), recognizing for her longtime support of the program.
Leave a Reply
1 Comment on "LIHEAP Advocates Make Push For Greater Funding on Capitol Hill"
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Rather than work to address the underlying causes of poverty, advocates want to throw more money at it, as if, more money is the solution. If the War on Poverty has taught any lesson, it is that money can not solve the problem. The solution is opportunity – at home, in school, and at work.
Ironically, (predictably?) it is green energy that drive up the cost of electricity, and directly impacts those who can least afford electricity the most. It is far better to drive down the cost of electricity to create jobs and prosperity, so that everyone can pay their own electricity bills.
For those on the left, whose goal is wealth redistribution, weatlth creation is viewed a zero sum activity. Therefore, in their minds, driving down the cost of electricity can’t help. It is better to take governent control of the utilities. Of course, they are wrong.
Government contol of goods and services in China, for example, is why 100’s of milions of Chinese live and die in poverty. In a free market, the opporutinty to create weatlh is limitless; it is government that stands in the way.
Those who voluntarily choose to drop out of school, take drugs, have children out of marriage, should not be rewarded. Charity can help, but people who make bad decisions should not be rewarded.