Energy Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) and Tax Reform
In Washington, tax reform is on everyone’s mind, and for good reason. The U.S. has always been a global leader in many areas, yet when it comes to the nation’s tax code, our political leaders are realizing that in many ways, we maintain an antiquated and often burdensome system.
That is why the commitment of the tax-writing committee chairmen—Sen. Max Baucus (D-Montana) and Rep. Dave Camp (R-Michigan)—to overhauling the tax code is so important: there is a key link between sound tax policy and creating a business environment that generates jobs and opportunity in the U.S.
Consequently, it is critical that lawmakers recognize that one of the most important objectives for a pro-jobs, pro-growth tax system is to help fulfill America’s transformational energy future. A cornerstone for such an effort would be the retention of master limited partnerships (MLPs) so that the U.S. can continue to finance important energy-infrastructure projects.
These investments have never been more vital. Recent technological innovations have made it possible for us to unlock vast new supplies of natural gas, allowing the nation to get to the energy it needs today, transforming our energy landscape long into the future. However, without the infrastructure required to connect producers to end-use consumers, the energy renaissance we all hope for will fall short.
MLPs have become an integral way in which our nation’s private sector finances the infrastructure needed to fully utilize domestic energy resources—leading to greater energy independence for the U.S.—and to ensure that a wide variety of energy products make their way efficiently and safely from the production fields to U.S. homes, businesses and communities.
In the context of tax reform, it is imperative that the Congress (and the Obama Administration) recognize that MLPs have worked as intended for more than 25 years and represent a key success in terms of public policy. Furthermore, MLPs clearly meet each of the qualifying factors that the Senate Finance Committee recently outlined in terms of tax treatments that merit retention:
1) Help grow the economy: MLPs contribute significant value to the U.S. economy by investing billions in infrastructure projects, supporting hundreds of thousands of quality jobs and providing a reliable income stream for investors, many of whom are retirees.
2) Make the tax code fairer: By creating partnership investments that come in affordable units that are liquid, MLPs allow smaller investors to invest in the development of our energy resources while providing the industry with a valuable source of capital.
3) Effectively promote other important policy objectives: MLPs operate in every state, producing, processing, transporting, storing and distributing energy products to meet the country’s growing demands. And to the extent that the vitality of our economy depends on the free flow of energy supplies, MLPs are a catalyst for growth, investment and job creation.
As the current tax-reform debate evolves, it is important to note that Washington has thoroughly examined the issue of MLPs in the past. In 1987, Congress considered whether MLPs should continue to be taxed as partnerships or instead should be required to pay corporate tax. Congress determined that while MLPs were not appropriate for all industries, those in the energy industry should continue to attract capital through the use of MLPs.
And while MLPs are formed for a number of reasons, it is the flow-through tax structure that makes them such an effective vehicle for energy infrastructure investment. Flow-through taxation lowers the cost of capital for a capital-intensive industry.
Since that time in 1987, MLPs have gone to work. Midstream MLPs own and operate about 300,000 miles of pipelines—natural gas, liquefied gas, refined product and crude oil pipelines— and supply the backbone of the country’s domestic energy system. These critical activities also have the added benefit of supporting approximately 323,000 quality U.S. jobs.
Any tax reform effort that would eliminate the flow-through tax treatment of MLPs would significantly and adversely impact future investment in our nation’s energy infrastructure and send a negative ripple effect throughout our economy due to higher energy costs (as well as major job losses).
It is our hope then that the U.S.’s energy economy and the goal of achieving energy independence become the highest priority for policymakers. We have such a historic opportunity to succeed in this regard and truly become a global leader in energy supply.
For these reasons, we are confident that leaders such as Sen. Baucus, Rep. Camp and legislative champions like Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) will navigate the challenges of the reform process once more and build a 21st century tax code that maintains the MLP tax structure.
Mary Lyman is executive director of the National Association of Publicly Traded Partnerships. This column originally ran in the September issue of Midstream Business Magazine.
Photo Credit: MLPs and Tax Reform/shutterstock
Other Posts by Mary Lyman
What are the emerging energy and utility trends?
"The Future of Energy and Utilities: An IBM Point of View."
|More coming soon...|
The Energy Collective
- Rod Adams
- Scott Edward Anderson
- Charles Barton
- Barry Brook
- Steven Cohen
- Dick DeBlasio
- Senator Pete Domenici
- Simon Donner
- Big Gav
- Michael Giberson
- Kirsty Gogan
- James Greenberger
- Lou Grinzo
- Jesse Grossman
- Tyler Hamilton
- Christine Hertzog
- David Hone
- Gary Hunt
- Jesse Jenkins
- Sonita Lontoh
- Rebecca Lutzy
- Jesse Parent
- Jim Pierobon
- Vicky Portwain
- Willem Post
- Tom Raftery
- Joseph Romm
- Robert Stavins
- Robert Stowe
- Geoffrey Styles
- Alex Trembath
- Gernot Wagner
- Dan Yurman