The Energy Collective

The world's best thinkers on energy and climate

  • Home
  • Post Here
  • Columns
    • Electricity Markets & Policy Group
    • Full Spectrum
    • Energy and Policy Developments
    • Game Changers
    • Energy for Human Development
    • Seeking Consensus
    • Green Growth
    • New Energy Voices
  • Fuels
    • Oil
    • Wind
    • Nuclear Power
    • Coal
    • Natural Gas
    • Solar Power
    • Renewables
    • Biofuels
    • Geothermal Energy
    • Wave & Tidal
    • Hydro Power
  • Environment
    • Carbon and De-carbonization
    • International Climate Conferences
    • Sustainability
    • Climate
    • Public Health
    • Water
    • Recycling
  • Grid
    • Smart Grid
    • Electricity
  • Tech
    • Cleantech
    • Green Building
    • Storage
    • Rare Earth Minerals
  • Business and Economy
    • Cap-and-Trade
    • Agriculture
    • Efficiency
    • Green Business
    • Utilities
    • Finance
    • Green Jobs
    • Subsidies
    • Risk Management
  • Politics
    • Environmental Policy
    • Energy Security
    • Communications and Messaging
    • China
  • Transport
  • Help
    • FAQ
  • Account
    • Login
    • Register

With Senate’s Support, Advanced Biofuel Industry Ready for Takeoff

November 30, 2012 by Nicole Lederer

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Image

When it comes to reducing the military’s dependence on oil, senators from both sides of the aisle have the Department of Defense’s back.

By striking down a pair of shortsighted amendments to the military’s annual spending bill, the Senate this week gave a green light to the DoD to pursue the biofuel initiatives senior military leaders say they want and need.

But the votes are more than just a hopeful sign of bipartisanship and less dependence on oil by our military. They also indicate that the Senate sees the potential in biofuel to improve our national security, protect our environment and – as a recent report from Environmental Entrepreneurs (E2) shows – expand our economy.

According to the report from E2, an organization I co-founded, the military’s biofuel initiatives will generate more than $10 billion in economic activity by 2020, helping create more than 14,000 new jobs in diverse sectors like agriculture, construction and transportation.

Unlike heavily subsidized fossil fuels, which rely on foreign countries and regimes hostile to the United States, the advanced biofuel industry features a domestic supply chain that has the potential to touch every corner of every state.

From farmers in California who grow sugar beets for feedstock, to workers at biorefineries in Illinois who turn used cooking oil into diesel, advanced biofuels put people to work producing clean energy that can power our military’s ships, planes and vehicles.

Military demand alone will require the industry to produce at least 770 million gallons of advanced biofuels per year, the E2 report found, with the Navy and Air Force both planning to get 50 percent of their fuels from advanced biofuels by 2020

The military wants these fuels because they know they work. The Navy, a big biofuel booster, powered an entire fleet of ships with biofuel during a recent demonstration in the Pacific Ocean. The Air Force, meanwhile, has successfully flown every major plane in its fleet on a biofuel blend.

The DoD also knows that being tethered to the global oil market is expensive. Every time the price of a barrel of oil ticks up $1, the military – and taxpayers – must fork over $130 million in funds that could otherwise support our troops.

But in order to meet the military’s demand – and spread the economic benefits of made-in-America energy across the country – the biofuel industry needed a market signal to attract investment capital.

The two Senate votes send that signal.

Now, at the critical early stages of growth, military support will help the nascent biofuel industry develop new technologies and build out new facilities. This scales up production and brings down costs – a role the DoD has played in industries like telecommunications and semiconductors.

As military support commercializes the industry, a new, much larger global market for these clean fuels could be commercial aviation, which like the military wants to reduce exposure to oil.

By trying to include anti-biofuel amendments in the National Defense Authorization Act, Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma and Sen. John McCain of Arizona placed a bull’s eye on the advanced biofuel industry. But they misfired.

Twice the majority of their colleagues in the Senate voted to stand with senior leaders in the Department of Defense, as well as the majority of Americans who strongly support alternatives to oil.

The senators whose votes protected the military’s biofuel initiatives deserve our thanks. They took a big step toward clearing the biofuel industry for takeoff.

Nicole Lederer is co-founder of Environmental Entrepreneurs (E2), a national community of business leaders who promote sound environmental policy that builds economic prosperity.

Image: Biofuels via Shutterstock

Related posts:

EU Energy Briefing: The Major Developments of 2013 [VIDEO] Seeking Consensus: A New Project on the Energy Collective The Bell Tolls for KiOR First Real Debate on the EU Energy Union Reveals Top Priorities [VIDEO]

Nicole Lederer

Filed Under: Biofuels, Environmental Policy, Oil Tagged With: Department of Defense (DOD), john mccain, military

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of

The Energy Collective Columns

Full Spectrum: Energy Analysis and Commentary with Jesse JenkinsEnergy and Policy Developments with John Miller
Game Changers column badgeEnergy for Human Development Column
Seeking Consensus with Schalk CloeteGreen Growth with Silvio Marcacci
New Energy VoicesMore coming soon...

Latest comments

  • Randy Dutton on Climate Change Optimism: Five Years of Change Megaquakes (8.5 and higher) impact global warming. According to NOAA, a six megaquake cluster has re (April 20, 2018 at 10:00 PM)
  • EngineerPoet on Closing Nuclear Reactors in Ohio and Pennsylvania Will Thwart Climate Goals Ontario already closed its last coal plant. (April 20, 2018 at 8:47 PM)
  • BobMeinetz on Closing Nuclear Reactors in Ohio and Pennsylvania Will Thwart Climate Goals Of course, Bas. Look at all the pretty red dots on the right side of your graph, where NPPs powered (April 20, 2018 at 6:08 PM)
  • Bas Gresnigt on Closing Nuclear Reactors in Ohio and Pennsylvania Will Thwart Climate Goals So those NPP's are happy to pay ~€60,000/hour*) each in order to get rid of their production... ___ (April 20, 2018 at 5:44 PM)

Advisory Panel

About the panel

Scott Edward Anderson is a consultant, blogger, and media commentator who blogs at The Green Skeptic. More »


Christine Hertzog is a consultant, author, and a professional explainer focused on Smart Grid. More »


Elias Hinckley is a strategic advisor on energy finance and energy policy to investors, energy companies and governments More »


Gary Hunt Gary is an Executive-in-Residence at Deloitte Investments with extensive experience in the energy & utility industries. More »


Jesse Jenkins is a graduate student and researcher at MIT with expertise in energy technology, policy, and innovation. More »


Jim Pierobon helps trade associations/NGOs, government agencies and companies communicate about cleaner energy solutions. More »


Geoffrey Styles is Managing Director of GSW Strategy Group, LLC and an award-winning blogger. More »


Featured Contributors

Rod Adams

Scott Edward Anderson

Charles Barton

Barry Brook

Steven Cohen

Dick DeBlasio

Senator Pete Domenici

Simon Donner

Big Gav

Michael Giberson

Kirsty Gogan

James Greenberger

Lou Grinzo

Jesse Grossman

Tyler Hamilton

Christine Hertzog

David Hone

Gary Hunt

Jesse Jenkins

Sonita Lontoh

Rebecca Lutzy

Jesse Parent

Jim Pierobon

Vicky Portwain

Willem Post

Tom Raftery

Joseph Romm

Robert Stavins

Robert Stowe

Geoffrey Styles

Alex Trembath

Gernot Wagner

Dan Yurman

 

 

 

Follow Us

32-linkedin 32-facebook 32-twitter 32-rss

Content for personal use only. Distribution prohibited. Republication in part or in whole is strictly prohibited. © All rights reserved Energy Central © 2018

Recent Comments

  • Randy Dutton on Climate Change Optimism: Five Years of Change
  • EngineerPoet on Closing Nuclear Reactors in Ohio and Pennsylvania Will Thwart Climate Goals
  • BobMeinetz on Closing Nuclear Reactors in Ohio and Pennsylvania Will Thwart Climate Goals

Recent Posts

  • What ALA’s Most Recent State of the Air Report Reveals About Oil and Gas Air Pollution in the Western U.S.
  • UK Will Legislate Net-Zero Carbon Emissions Target, Says Minister
  • Why EPA’s U-Turn on Auto Efficiency Rules Gives China the Upper Hand

Useful Pages

  • Terms of Use
  • Comments Policy
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • Help
  • About and Contact Us
Copyright © 2018 Energy Central. All Rights Reserved
This site uses cookies, for a number of reasons. By continuing to use this website you accept the use of cookies. Find out more.