The Energy Collective

The world's best thinkers on energy and climate

  • Home
  • Post Here
  • Columns
    • Electricity Markets & Policy Group
    • Full Spectrum
    • Energy and Policy Developments
    • Game Changers
    • Energy for Human Development
    • Seeking Consensus
    • Green Growth
    • New Energy Voices
  • Fuels
    • Oil
    • Wind
    • Nuclear Power
    • Coal
    • Natural Gas
    • Solar Power
    • Renewables
    • Biofuels
    • Geothermal Energy
    • Wave & Tidal
    • Hydro Power
  • Environment
    • Carbon and De-carbonization
    • International Climate Conferences
    • Sustainability
    • Climate
    • Public Health
    • Water
    • Recycling
  • Grid
    • Smart Grid
    • Electricity
  • Tech
    • Cleantech
    • Green Building
    • Storage
    • Rare Earth Minerals
  • Business and Economy
    • Cap-and-Trade
    • Agriculture
    • Efficiency
    • Green Business
    • Utilities
    • Finance
    • Green Jobs
    • Subsidies
    • Risk Management
  • Politics
    • Environmental Policy
    • Energy Security
    • Communications and Messaging
    • China
  • Transport
  • Help
    • FAQ
  • Account
    • Login
    • Register

Don’t Believe the Fantasy Job Claims on Keystone XL: It’s Not in Our Best Interest

January 14, 2012 by Nicole Lederer

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable say they speak for the country’s business interests.

When it comes to the Keystone XL pipeline, they most definitely do not.

In his “State of American Business speech,” U.S. Chamber president Tom Donohue once again trotted out his fantasy claims about the importance to our economy of this foreign pipeline scheme.  

 Mr. Donohue painted the pipeline as a savior for America’s economy, saying it would put “20,000 Americans to work right away and up to 250,000 over the life of the project.” Business Roundtable president John Engler is making similarly false claims.

ButTransCanada, the company that wants to build the export line, acknowledges in a CNN interview here it will only create a few hundred permanent jobs in the United States. The State Department’s analysis (see the department’s EIS, p. 3.10-80 here) shows that only 20 – that’s right, 20 – full-time U.S. jobs will be created after construction is finished.

Another piece of fantasy that Mr. Donahue advances is that the Keystone Pipeline will provide our country with more energy security, and that we’ll have access to oil from our friendly neighbor to the north.

The truth about this project is that a Canadian company wants to run this pipeline through the heartland of the United States for the purpose of transporting the toxic sludge known as tar sands bitumen to Gulf of Mexico refineries.  From there, the majority of this product is destined for the global oil market, where we’ll have no more access to it than we do to oil pumped in the Middle East.

And the cherry on top of this proposition is that for very few jobs and no increased access to oil, we get to assume the liability of this project and its negative impact on our land, water and atmosphere. 

What a deal.

There are other big risks as well.  Remaining dependent on oil – and yes in this case it is foreign oil – keeps our economy hostage to other countries. Remember, most of the oil that runs through this pipeline will end up on the world market where it is just as likely to end up in China as it is in Cleveland. It won’t reduce our gas prices here one bit.

And then there are the lost opportunity costs. As long as we keep supporting ways to prolong our dependence on oil, the farther we fall behind on innovation of new energy sources and on building a more sustainable economy based on clean, renewable energy.

Instead of putting our support behind a Canadian company that just wants the right of way to move its product down the heart of our country, we should be putting more support behind the innovative U.S. companies that are trying to develop clean, domestic renewable energy we can harness right here in the United States.

You won’t hear this from the oil lobby, but the renewable energy industry is where the real jobs are. It is the brightest spot in our economy. The number of jobs in the solar industry alone doubled last year, and are expected to grow by another 26 percent in the current year. Try to find another industry growing at that rate.

Contrast that with the oil and gas industry. Despite raking in $546 billion in profits in the past five years, the oil and gas industry laid off more than 11,000 American workers – even while simultaneously charging record prices at the pump.

It’s time to move forward toward real energy security and a cleaner, renewable energy economy in the United States that will foster real American innovation and create real American jobs.

Keystone XL is against the best interest of our country.

 

Related posts:

The Costs of Delaying Keystone XL Turning to Energy for Jobs Keystone XL Pipeline: It’s About the Jobs, the Economy and Security The SOTU and Energy

Nicole Lederer

Filed Under: Energy and Economy, Green Jobs Tagged With: economy, green jobs, jobs, Keystone XL Pipeline, obama, oil, pipeline, tar sands, transcanada

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of

The Energy Collective Columns

Full Spectrum: Energy Analysis and Commentary with Jesse JenkinsEnergy and Policy Developments with John Miller
Game Changers column badgeEnergy for Human Development Column
Seeking Consensus with Schalk CloeteGreen Growth with Silvio Marcacci
New Energy VoicesMore coming soon...

Latest comments

  • Jarmo on New Solar Capacity Exceeded All Other Fuel Sources Combined in 2017, Study Finds https://www.thirdway.org/memo/nuclear-closures-undo-years-worth-of-climate-progress This article pu (April 22, 2018 at 5:57 AM)
  • Geoff Thomas on New Study Explores the Market Value of Offshore Wind It is wise that the Authors noted their dependance on earlier figures because of three major items, (April 22, 2018 at 4:51 AM)
  • Roger Arnold on $100 Oil Is Back On The Table "The cost of had"? I recommend proof reading what you've written before hitting 'post'. Relying on s (April 21, 2018 at 8:15 PM)
  • BobMeinetz on Climate Change Optimism: Five Years of Change Correction, Bob - quantities of both insolation and human consumption should be per year, not per da (April 21, 2018 at 4:09 PM)

Advisory Panel

About the panel

Scott Edward Anderson is a consultant, blogger, and media commentator who blogs at The Green Skeptic. More »


Christine Hertzog is a consultant, author, and a professional explainer focused on Smart Grid. More »


Elias Hinckley is a strategic advisor on energy finance and energy policy to investors, energy companies and governments More »


Gary Hunt Gary is an Executive-in-Residence at Deloitte Investments with extensive experience in the energy & utility industries. More »


Jesse Jenkins is a graduate student and researcher at MIT with expertise in energy technology, policy, and innovation. More »


Jim Pierobon helps trade associations/NGOs, government agencies and companies communicate about cleaner energy solutions. More »


Geoffrey Styles is Managing Director of GSW Strategy Group, LLC and an award-winning blogger. More »


Featured Contributors

Rod Adams

Scott Edward Anderson

Charles Barton

Barry Brook

Steven Cohen

Dick DeBlasio

Senator Pete Domenici

Simon Donner

Big Gav

Michael Giberson

Kirsty Gogan

James Greenberger

Lou Grinzo

Jesse Grossman

Tyler Hamilton

Christine Hertzog

David Hone

Gary Hunt

Jesse Jenkins

Sonita Lontoh

Rebecca Lutzy

Jesse Parent

Jim Pierobon

Vicky Portwain

Willem Post

Tom Raftery

Joseph Romm

Robert Stavins

Robert Stowe

Geoffrey Styles

Alex Trembath

Gernot Wagner

Dan Yurman

 

 

 

Follow Us

32-linkedin 32-facebook 32-twitter 32-rss

Content for personal use only. Distribution prohibited. Republication in part or in whole is strictly prohibited. © All rights reserved Energy Central © 2018

Recent Comments

  • Jarmo on New Solar Capacity Exceeded All Other Fuel Sources Combined in 2017, Study Finds
  • Geoff Thomas on New Study Explores the Market Value of Offshore Wind
  • Roger Arnold on $100 Oil Is Back On The Table

Recent Posts

  • The U.S. is an Active Participant in Petroleum Markets as Both an Importer and Exporter
  • What ALA’s Most Recent State of the Air Report Reveals About Oil and Gas Air Pollution in the Western U.S.
  • UK Will Legislate Net-Zero Carbon Emissions Target, Says Minister

Useful Pages

  • Terms of Use
  • Comments Policy
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • Help
  • About and Contact Us
Copyright © 2018 Energy Central. All Rights Reserved
This site uses cookies, for a number of reasons. By continuing to use this website you accept the use of cookies. Find out more.