Australian Energy Utilities at the Brink?
In case you hadn’t noticed, there is a lot going on in the Australian solar energy industry right now.
In fact, I’ll rephrase that – there’s a lot going on in the Australian energy industry right now and in case you hadn’t noticed, solar is a major player.
Australia loves solar.
On the one hand, we are battered and bruised from the incessant winding back of support programs (while support for fossil fuels rises) and the Government’s solution to climate change is defined as not putting a price on carbon. Virtually the only remaining program we have ( The Renewable Energy Target) is going through a pointless review headed by a panel who don’t think that emission reductions are required and want to lower the cost of electricity so we can all use more. Luckily we also have an invisible, non-defined new program without any funding in Direct Action, that will apparently save us.
As I have said before, all the Government and utilities can do is stall because solar is inevitable so although we seem to have go through this (potential) dip, you just can’t beat a good man down. We aren’t down yet (sales have been slightly higher than forecast so far) and we’ve learned a few tricks along the way to make it a damn good fight.
The RET Review submission process is a good example. The review process has to run its course and then submit its recommendations to Government which will take at least a couple of months. Then, Government has to decide what to do with the recommendations and what if any legislation they want to change and then, get it through the Senate. News in yesterday is that the review panel received a staggering 22,000 community submissions including 12,500 from renewable energy supporters, 250 from wind farmers and workers are concerned about drought proofing their farms and communities, and 1,500 from people in community organizations trying to develop community owned wind and solar projects.
Well done to everyone who invested their time and money in stating the case for renewable energy support. It’s not just companies or those with vested interests; the bulk of submissions came from Australia’s Solar Citizens and they love their solar.
I would be surprised if any Australian Government has ever, in our National history, received so many submissions on a single issue.
Sure, many are simple submissions, but I know for a fact that many people and organisations put in very detailed and complex submissions too.Many (including our’s) was focused on encouraging the Panel and Government to seize this opportunity to not only continue supporting renewable energy, but to transform the energy sector. I vote we buy the Panel a coffee maker, because they have an awful lot of reading to do and a battery of fine facts to understand.
Because we are affecting the energy industry, we are now materially part of the energy industry. And that, as we all know is not going down so well with the majority of incumbents who are on the brink of major upheavals.
Not a week goes by when I don’t hear another story about something that the utilities are doing (retailers and DNSP’s) which is either leveraging their monopolistic power or simply slowing the uptake of solar in crude blanket like maneuvers.
Take Queensland’s proposed new Draft Connection Standard for Small Scale Inverter Energy Systems. This was released a few weeks ago and the ramifications are still rippling through industry. The principle is fantastic; introduce a technical standard that better manages voltage rise issues and thus, allow more solar on the network without introducing problems. I commend Energex and Ergon for this.
However, its also clear that this has some profound implications. Both these Government owned utilities know that AS4777 is under re-development and has these very issues in mind, but re-writing a significant standard that is almost ten years old is a huge task. Currently, the PV industry is driving its reform but it s a slow task run by volunteers who quite frankly, face re-engineering of their products as an outcome at significant expensive in most cases. The utilities on the other hand, will benefit from improved power quality if reactive power correction becomes standard in inverters; solar systems will benefit their networks and potentially deliver financial gains for them. Even worse, there is a potential energy loss for solar owners, if we start playing around with power factor.
AS4777′s revision is underway so what possible justification is there for the Queensland Government owned utilities to drag the process forward? With around 4 weeks to respond they have set a potential implementation deadline of the 1st of July 2014. This is a grossly inadequate time frame for Distributors to clear stock and order new compliant stock, even if the technical specifications were concise and complete (which they aren’t), let alone educating the market and customers about how the potential loss of energy affects their proposition. To top it all off, enforcing the proposed reactive power specifications would actually put installers in breach of the Clean Energy Council, Clean Energy Regulator Guidelines and a bunch or associated rules and regulations.
So what does bringing it forward achieve? It wastes industries time, will potentially cost a huge amount of money on an issue they were already working on and delivers potential savings to the Government owned utilities, whilst potentially adding cost to solar systems. I am assured it’s designed as a process of discussions and negotiation which is great but in all honesty, if they wanted this fixed faster, then they could simply have invested in accelerating the revision of AS4777 or convening urgent working groups, instead of shoving the issue up our clacker with a deadline they know damn well is utterly ludicrous. (By the way, you can take this as my submission if you like). :)
Then there is the quite stunning case of ACTEW/AGL. ACTEW AGL are a private/Government partnership who provide energy to the majority of the ACT’s 300,00 electricity customers. There is contestability in the ACT, but with the countries lowest energy prices, few others bother to sell energy there. In a confounding example of the manic behaviour of utilities in recent times, the private part of this partnership (AGL) switched its position on the RET from “sounds ok, we can live with that” to “its unattainable and should be completely axed” in its RET review submission.
Ironically, this about face was only days after a lovely story in which ACTEW/AGL announced that “Today (May 6th) marks an exciting milestone for the organisation as we officially launch our Actew/AGL Solar product.” Now AGL have been playing in solar for some time so I was a bit confused about what was new, but the irony and blaming solar for the rising cost of electricity and negative impacts on their business models in their RET submission, whilst simultaneously launching a solar offer was not lost on me. But what really got me was the rather frank admission that looked to me like a potential abuse of market power or at minimum, certainly leveraging their market power for competitive advantage over every other solar provider.Their story and web page says “You’ll get the most accurate and realistic estimate of the savings you can make by installing solar. That’s because, as your local energy retailer, we have your energy data readily on hand.”
What this statement infers to consumers is that this Government Private partnership (who are uniquely DNSP and retailer in one) can get this data more easily, faster and do the sums better than a solar company who is not a utility; If that is not an abuse of market power I don’t know what is. Given that most ACT residents don’t have interval meters, I also wonder what real advantage they do have?
Now I look forward to being corrected but regularly experience the aggravation, hassle, time and in many cases cost of getting billing data from utilities, and what I hear from installers is that the ACT is no different. If I’m wrong, I’m sure ACTEW/AGL will let me know what their process and advantages are and in the spirit of openness and transparency, make that same process and data access available to all solar installers.
Leaving solar just for minute, it’s worth remembering that consumers can all “switch and save”; the Government (no less) has told us all that that’s the best way to buy electricity. Negotiate a contract, get a discount and everything will be sweet. Except for the catch, which we have highlighted before. The catch is that if you don’t pay astounding detail to what the renewals say, you’ll find yourself losing your discount very quickly, as one very astute customer noted yesterday in the Herald. Geoff Dunsford noted that he had a 12% discount under contract and was urged to “renew and get 4% off” . What his persistence showed was that this was not an additional 4% but rather, a total of 4% discount meaning his price would go up by around 8% or around $600 a year
I don’t know about you, but when i start take advantage at every possible opportunity.
It’s really no wonder there is an energy revolution underway, is it?
Photo Credit: Australian Solar Industry/shutterstock
Nigel Morris has been involved in the PV industry for almost 20 years and is the founder of SolarBusinessServices, one of Australia’s leading PV consultancies. He began his PV career as the manufacturing manager with one of Australia’s pioneers in renewable energy and during his 5 years there, was a system designer, manufacturer, installer, salesman and company director. In 1997 he moved ...
Other Posts by Nigel Morris
What are the emerging energy and utility trends?
"The Future of Energy and Utilities: An IBM Point of View."
|More coming soon...|
The Energy Collective
- Rod Adams
- Scott Edward Anderson
- Charles Barton
- Barry Brook
- Steven Cohen
- Dick DeBlasio
- Senator Pete Domenici
- Simon Donner
- Big Gav
- Michael Giberson
- Kirsty Gogan
- James Greenberger
- Lou Grinzo
- Jesse Grossman
- Tyler Hamilton
- Christine Hertzog
- David Hone
- Gary Hunt
- Jesse Jenkins
- Sonita Lontoh
- Rebecca Lutzy
- Jesse Parent
- Jim Pierobon
- Vicky Portwain
- Willem Post
- Tom Raftery
- Joseph Romm
- Robert Stavins
- Robert Stowe
- Geoffrey Styles
- Alex Trembath
- Gernot Wagner
- Dan Yurman